In the test, the software compared about 25-30MB per second. Depending on the size of the scheduled backup, synchronizing the contents of the file can take a lot of time. Available options are file content, date stamp, timestamp, and file size. The selections include, among other things, which method the software uses to compare the databases. You can control the behavior by clicking on the cogwheel next to it. To get an overview of the differences of the existing databases, click on Compare. By clicking on Browse to the right of the input fields, you can select the paths using the integrated file manager. To this end, above the lists, you'll see an input field where you can enter the respective paths. The first step is to determine which disk or directories you want to include in the synchronization. The main window with its three panes displays the directories to be synchronized and a checklist. The software also has a small statistics display at the bottom right. A routine for creating filter criteria is hiding behind the button with a funnel icon. The two buttons Compare and Synchronize particularly stand out the cogwheel buttons next to them can be used to access the corresponding settings. The menubar is in the header with the toolbar underneath. The intuitively designed program window will catch your eye when you first start it. Īfter successful installation, FreeFileSync appears in the menu structure with a starter, which you can click for easy access. There, the developers provide both customized tarballs for some large distributions as well as the source code for a manual build. However, if the current latest version (6.13) is important to you, you will need to download it from the project website. Most common distributions have FreeFileSync in their repositories, and you can usually install it easily using a package manager such as Synaptic or YaST. This is where FreeFileSync, which is aimed specifically at private users, comes in. Traditional backup solutions, however, are often cumbersome to operate and can overwhelm home users with a wealth of functions they don't need. Thus, it becomes even more important to back up your data so that it's not lost if the hard drive fails. The stored data often includes irreplaceable material, such as photos from birthday parties or holiday videos. The two disks are protected and stored in plastic cases padded with foam.Thanks to digital cameras, MP3 players, and smartphones with HD video capabilities, users can easily fill up their terabyte-sized mass storage devices. For the same reason, I don’t use external drives as I recall having read that the drives used are the ones failing the standards for desktop use and are therefore lower grade and more likely to fail. In a low intensity scenario as is mine (the disks are only spun up a couple times a month at best), it’s perhaps not necessary to have the best reliability but it’s certainly a peace of mind and a way to limit risks. They upload each quarter the reliability results from each of their drive pools and HGST always places among the bests in regards to low failure rates. I personally use HGST 4To drives after having read the reliability results from Backblaze’s website, which is a cloud storage company using consumer grade hard drives in their servers. My current method of backup up my data is to have a local work copy on a SSD drive on my desktop and to create two copies on two separates hard drives which are kept disconnected and stored in a safe place. This post is the first part of my workflow taking care of preserving the integrity of my data and media files over time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |